qvib.pro
RU

Harvey

What for: professional AI for lawyers — legal research, due diligence, drafting and document review with agentic workflows.

платно профи

Оценка $11B; 100k+ юристов в 1300+ организациях, большинство AmLaw 100 (пресса) checked 2026-06-01

Updated: 02.07.2026

Open source ↗

Harvey

What it is and who it's for

Harvey is a professional AI platform for lawyers: legal research, due diligence, drafting and document review with agentic workflows under enterprise security controls. Built for law firms and in-house teams (mostly large ones) that need AI tailored to legal work and compliance rather than a general-purpose chatbot. It stands out for enterprise maturity, legal-specific agents and wide adoption across the AmLaw 100.

Key features

  • Legal research and analysis grounded in sources.
  • Document drafting and review, due diligence across large document sets.
  • Agentic workflows for specific legal processes.
  • Works against the firm's own knowledge base and documents (Vault).
  • Enterprise security and data controls.
  • Integrations into a law firm's existing workflows.

Get started in 5 minutes

  1. It's an enterprise product — access goes through a demo or a chat with the team at harvey.ai.
  2. After onboarding, load your documents and reference material into the workspace (Vault).
  3. Assign research, drafting or review tasks and check the output against the citations.

When to pick it, when not to

  • ✅ Pick it if you're a large firm or in-house team that needs comprehensive legal AI with security and agents.
  • ✅ Pick it if high volumes of due diligence and drafting need to scale.
  • ❌ Skip it → go with "Spellbook" if you want something more affordable that lives right inside Word for contract review and drafting.
  • ❌ Skip it → go with "CoCounsel" if access to Thomson Reuters' Westlaw and Practical Law matters.

The honest price

Enterprise subscription on request (custom pricing, aimed at firms); there's no public self-serve tier. Exact numbers are on the vendor's site and do change.

Gotchas

  • High barrier to entry and high cost — overkill for a small practice.
  • AI doesn't replace a lawyer: every answer and draft still needs a professional's review.
  • Rollout and integration take time and team training.
  • Jurisdictional coverage depends on the underlying data — verify it for Russian law.

🤖 Prompt accelerator

"I'm evaluating Harvey for a <law firm / in-house team> handling <DESCRIBE: due diligence / drafting / review>. Help me build a list of questions for the demo and pilot (data security, jurisdiction coverage, integrations, agent scenarios), quality criteria to score it on our own documents, and a pilot test plan. What should I verify before we buy?"

Читать по-русски →